![]() |
| Photo by American Public Power Association on Unsplash |
Tax policy commentator Archie Parnell ran for a seat in the South Carolina 5th Congressional District in 2018. A part of Archie Parnell’s platform focused on improving South Carolina’s aging infrastructure, as the state earned a D on the 2017 Infrastructure Report Card.
One of the major hazards mentioned in the report was the condition of the state’s dams. Currently, almost 80 of South Carolina’s dams have failed due to the impact of hurricanes Matthew and Florence. In 2015, a flood caused more than 50 dams to fail, which then resulted in millions of property losses and a swarm of lawsuits. Even with these failures, though, very little has been done to remedy this situation.
Conversely, bills have been introduced that would reduce safety regulations and state oversight. SB 81 and SB 107 would potentially remove state oversight from over 1,700 dams in the state. The bills would also remove regulations for low-hazard dams and could be catastrophic for residents impacted by dam failures.
Dams with high-hazard potential are ones classified as having the likelihood for failure or having the likelihood for causing loss of life and significant property damage. Of the 2,300 dams in the state, only 178 of them are rated as high-hazard, and just under 90 percent of state dams have emergency action plans (EAPs). However, increasingly frequent and severe natural disasters, combined with aging or weakening structures, mandate that safety regulations and efforts are made to improve dam infrastructure.

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.